Re: Misdirected E-mail #2/Take a deep breath all

["Greg Odegaard" <grodeg@xxxxxxxxxx>]

IF a Lance pouts in the woods and no is there to hear him, does anyone
really care?

I won't kill file him because I vilified those who did me before and besides
it reminds me of my wife asking why we were watching Twin Peaks on TV in the
early 90's; because you just couldn't believe the crazy and stupid things
they did each week. I got to read Stretches emails because I just believe he
keeps coming back for more with this blathering drivel. Like a runner
getting trampled in Pamplona by the bulls, he just keeps getting back up to
get kicked in the head again, and the amazing part it might make him
smarter, and it certainly doesn't hurt in the ugly department.

OK Lance, PP is the devil in short pants, we get your point, move on to
something more interesting, or at least more becoming of your intended goal
of having someone care that you even breath, let alone type with more than
one finger.

I think I here foot steps coming up to the basement door somewhere.
Greg

----- Original Message -----
From: "Cecil" <cecil@hfx.eastlink.ca>
To: <celtics@igtc.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: Misdirected E-mail #2/Take a deep breath all


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Lance Jacobson <lancejacob@attbi.com>
> To: Greg Odegaard <grodeg@kalama.com>; Shawn Niles <shizzjr@hotmail.com>;
> <cecil@hfx.eastlink.ca>; <celtics@igtc.com>
> Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 10:08 PM
> Subject: Re: Misdirected E-mail #2/Take a deep breath all
>
>
> > > >I guess it is obvious that Joe H's post asking Lance to stop with the
> > > >personal digs was a wasted effort.  I just don't see the need for
> mixing
> > > >basketball with snide remarks like this.>>Cecil
> >
> > Nothing adversarial about a post that suggests that Pierce actual got
any
> Celtics
> > involved?
> >
> > That's more of an insult to one's intelligence than an internet chat
with
> Chris
> > Wallace.
>
> **The word adversarial is not even in the piece which you used.  My
problem
> with you has nothing to do with basketball talk.  It is that you refuse to
> keep it to that.  You have a need to post about why Tammo pisses you off
so
> much, yet you have been asked repeatedly to tone down the dramatics
yourself
> by several members of this list, which you obviously have little concern
> for.  You stated recently that you were done talking about Pierce.
>
> I mentioned before that I thought you enjoy the "arguments" so much that
you
> are not beyond instigation.  I think this is a sad fact which you are
> proving ad nauseum.  You are being killfiled by many people on this list,
> which is one reason why only a few respond to your posts.  I am trying not
> to do the same.
>
> Cecil
>
>
>
> >
> > Paul can shoot and drive, but I'd love to see some evidence that he
> actually acted
> > like a playmaker in ANY of those 82 games this past season.  He only had
> 42 min per
> > game, so I can understand that he was limited, but it's a nasty joke to
be
> told that
> > he spent one moment working on getting somebody else a shot.
> >
> > You call that adversarial, I call it journalistic conscience.  Suit
> yourself, Cecil. .
> > .but try coming up with a play in which Pierce actually worked to get
> someone else the
> > ball, rather than a phony NBA assist that came from driving into three
> players and
> > bailing out . . yet getting credited for an assist.