Re: Celts tanking

["Troy Hash" <troyhash@kih.net>]

There is a reason that Brown has bounced around the NBA more times than a
ping pong ball, it is because he sucks!!!  Best defender in Pitino era??
Maybe, but that is misleading because no one defends in Pitegos' system.
Who is better, Brown for 3 years 2+million $ per year or Brunson for league
minimum.  No question Brunson is the better deal.  IF you don't think so
then YOU stop smoking crack.  As for ML, I said that with a little sarcasm,
but Pitego has done no better than ML.  Both hand out big salaries to very
average  players like they are giving away free turkeys at Thanksgiving.  No
I don't want ML back, but Pitego's record is just a bad.  Example:  Cheaney
vs. Greg Minor ,  Walter vs Pervis,  and then there is the Mills,
Potastenko, and now Brown deals???  Not only could I do better, but OUR
GRANDMOTHERS  could do better. Confusious also say" team that lose under ML
Carr GM also lose under Pitego GM".

----- Original Message -----
From: bird <birdw@aloha.net>
To: <Celtics@igtc.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2000 12:45 AM
Subject: Re: Celts tanking


> >From: "Troy Hash" <troyhash@kih.net>
> >
> >I don't know about tanking, but it is obvious from past and current, that
> >Randy Brown is no better than a Rick Brunson or any other dime pickup
from
> >the CBA.
>
> Obvious?  I hardly think so.  Brown is the best defending point guard
> the C's have had in the Pitino era.  Billups is the only other pg who
> comes close.  And he's not that close.
>
> >Anyone besided me miss ML Carr as GM??
>
> Stay off the crack, Troy.  It ain't good for you.  Confucius say,
> "Man who miss ML Carr as GM misses losing."
>
> Pitino is hardly a great GM, but I bet even you would be better than ML.
>
> Bill
> --
> wm. l. bird
> mailto:birdw@aloha.net
> "I, too, am running with this devil that you speak of."
>
>