Re: RP on Barros

["Cecil Wright" <cecil@hfx.andara.com>]

I can't see how you can justify the no PT assertion when he averages more
mpg than any of the other players mentioned, including Dana.

Nash     - 21.9mpg
Eisley    -20.9mpg
Fisher    -20.8mpg
Barros   -19.9mpg

Cecil
-----Original Message-----
From: Evan LaGrasse <01elagra@jasper.uor.edu>
To: Celtics@igtc.COM <Celtics@igtc.COM>
Date: Sunday, April 12, 1998 4:55 PM
Subject: RE: RP on Barros


>
>
>On Sat, 11 Apr 1998, John Lyell wrote:
>
>> I agree Fisher, Nash & Eisley are definitely better at the point
position.
>>
>
>I agree as well. Is there any possible way we could get Steve Nash next
>year??? He is one of the most underrated players in the NBA, in my
>opinion, and gets no PT in Phoenix. It would also allow Dana to move to
>the backup 2 spot. Will Nash be a free agent this year or does he have one
>of those 3 year rookie contracts? I can't remember whether he was picked
>in the 1st or 2nd round.
>
>Evan
>
>