Re: RP on Barros

["Cecil Wright" <cecil@hfx.andara.com>]

mpg -ga - gm- fg%-3a -3m - 3% -fta -ftm- ft% -apg-stl-ppg
11.7-184-80 -.435- 6  -  1  -.167  -95-76 -.800- 2.6-46-5.0
  9.7- 121-44-.364- 8  -  3  -.375  -68-48 -.706- 1.9- 9 -3.2

Tyus
Jacques
-----Original Message-----
From: ramani_rite@lnmta.bentley.edu <ramani_rite@lnmta.bentley.edu>
To: celtics@igtc.COM <celtics@igtc.COM>
Date: Sunday, April 12, 1998 1:13 AM
Subject: Re: RP on Barros


>Can we compare the stats line for Tyus and Jacques Vaughn? I have a feeling
>that Pitino might go after him, considering that he played in Kansas. Like
>Roy Rogers and his 13 blocks vs Kentucky when Pitino was there.
>
>Ritesh Ramani
>
>
>
> (Embedded
> image moved   Cecil Wright <cecil@hfx.andara.com>
> to file:      04/11/98 10:02 PM
> PIC20713.PCX)
>
>
>
>
>To:   John Lyell <Jlyell@concentric.net>, Celtics@igtc.com
>cc:
>Subject:  Re: RP on Barros
>
>
>
>
>I became interested in checking the stats of these guys:
> mpg- fga - fgm - fg% - 3pa-3pm-3p% - ft%  - apg - stl  - ppg
>20.9 -471 - 202 -.429 - 106- 40  -.377 -.853 - 4.2  - 47 - 7.4
>20.8 -341 - 150 -.440 -  69 - 26  -.377 -.745 - 3.9  - 72 - 5.7
>21.9 -550 - 251 -.456 - 177- 72  -.407 -.866 - 3.3  - 58 - 9.0
>19.9 -531 - 249 -.469 - 211- 88  -.417 -.841 - 3.4  - 74 - 9.4
>If you take a look at these figures, you'll notice that nobody really seems
>to standout above the others.  Though it appears that the player who
>averages 20.8mpg is less of an offensive threat compared to the rest.  The
>players are:
>1.  Howard Eisley
>2.  Derek Fisher
>3.  Steve Nash
>4.  Dana Barros
>Dana has more steals, a much better fg%, 3p% and ppg in less minutes of
>playing time than the other 3 players.  His assist ratio isn't much lower
>than theirs.  The only negative for him may be that he's older and makes
>more money.  But on the basis of his play, I can't see how you can say
>Eisley, Nash and Fisher are *definitely* better at the point position.
>The one category I have neglected is turnovers, which maybe someone else
>has
>the stats for.
>Cecil
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: John Lyell <Jlyell@concentric.net>
>To: Celtics@igtc.COM <Celtics@igtc.COM>
>Date: Saturday, April 11, 1998 2:37 PM
>Subject: RE: RP on Barros
>
>>I agree Fisher, Nash & Eisley are definitely better at the point position.
>>
>>
>>On Friday, April 10, 1998 9:08 AM, Jeremy Warren
>[SMTP:jeremy.warren@alphatech.com] wrote:
>>>                       RE>RP on Barros
>4/10/98
>>>
>>> I'll assume that he meant he wouldn't trade Dana for any other backup
>point
>>> guard.  But I still have to disagree.  I would rather have Howard
>Eisley,
>>> Derek Fisher, Steve Nash, and Eric Murdock than Dana Barros.  Is there
>anyone
>>> I'm forgetting?
>>>
>>> Jeremy
>>>
>>> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1998 10:54:32 -0500
>>> From: Theresa Lee <tjoyce@mit.edu>
>>> Subject: RP on Barros
>>>
>>> During the pregame show last night, Pitino talked about Dana Barros. He
>>> said that is the best backup point guard in the league and he would not
>>> trade him for any other point guard in the league.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>