[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: jerry stackhouse? (was Re: Jackson Sensation)
- Subject: Re: jerry stackhouse? (was Re: Jackson Sensation)
- From: "Alford, Douglas" <Alfordd@gould.pvt.k12.me.us>
- Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 09:07:59 EST
>Stackhouse is mainly a 6'6" two guard.
>right - so that supports my point. why do the celtics need another 2?
The Celtics need another 2 because of several reasons.:
1) Day is a free agent and (hopefully) will be gone.
2) Brown is useless and whiny, and has pissed off everyone in Boston
by wanting a trade. Besides, he was hurt all year. Who knows about
next year.
3) Barros is a definite perimeter threat, but is unfortunately no
taller than me, so how can he defend against the taller 2 guards out
there? He can't.
4) Minor hasn't lived up to his expectations; he's athletic but not
much of a scorer.
5) If we lose Fox to free agency (hope not), we will be without
anyone to play the 2 position. Besides, Fox is really a SF (and that
is Antoine's postion anyway).
HOWEVER......whoever said that it didn't matter that Stack turns the
ball over alot is way off base. Would you want your scorer to be a
guy prone to losing the ball?
- -Doug
Alfordd@gould.pvt.k12.me.us