Re: Dana supporters, speak out!

- ----------
>John Liang stated:

>  If we should trade Dana, we should also trade Wes (for 
> example) because he looked bad sometimes too. I know this would sound 
> stupid (about trading Wes), but so does all the talks about trading 
> Dana. I think some people have a problem with Dana because he is making
good  money. I personally don't think he makes too much. However, too much
or 
> not, it is not Dana Barros who is paying Dana Barros that money, and all 
> should do well to remember that. It sounds very "sour grape" to me.
> Anyway, I don't ask everyone to agree with me, I just ask all those Dana 
> supporters out there to voice their support!
> 

John, have to disagree on this one.  Barros is a  " gunner"  in the truest
form.  All he want's to do is shoot the ball as Philly let him do a few
years ago.  He has been in the league what now about 5-6 years and has
really not improved his shooting consistency,  or defensive ability.  I
would take Wesley over Barros any day. At least Wes plays some D.  You
can't compare Wes and his $350,000 salary to Barros & his $3-$4M a year ? 
Who are we getting our money's worth out of ? You are correct, based on the
latest wave of salaries his is really not as outrageous as when he signed,
and Wesley will want some $$ to resign.

If he can not consistently come off the bench, score & play defense, he is
a liability IMO.  We can not be successful with a backcourt of 6' & under
when you are going up against guys 6'4' to 6'9".

You are correct, he can get hot and shoot the Celtics to victory, but seems
to more often stay cold,  and shoot them to the Duncan derby.  That game
against the Knicks last year was pitiful, he just wanted to keep his 3
point streak alive and didn' t care if he team won or lost.