[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
allyoop.com
- Subject: allyoop.com
- From: jan crocker <pravda@tiac.net>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 1997 07:56:02 -0400
For anyone interested in "The basketball page for thinking fans" check out
allyoop.com.
They have not been very kind concerning any of the moves this off season so
that should sooth the "glass is half empty" crew on this list.
JC
AUGUST 23 - As the follow-up to Thursday's Eric Williams
trade
, the Boston Celtics' continued their offseason roster
makeover by
signing F Chris Mills, formerly of the Cleveland
Cavaliers, and G
Tyus Edney, formerly with Sacramento Kings.
Terms of the deals were not announced, which makes the
analysis a
bit more difficult. However, a team official did say
that Mills signed a multi-year deal.
I think we can deduce from this that Edney did not
sign a multi-year deal, and indeed may have agreed to a
one-year
contract for the minimum veteran salary of $327,000 with
the
understanding that Boston would reward him after the
season. Since
the Celtics traded Eric Williams last week in order to
clear the salary
cap room to sign Mills, we can assume a) his contract
ate up the
remainder of Boston's salary cap room, and b) Edney's
contract was
for less than Williams was going to make.
For you Celtics fans out there, my take on these moves
is basically
the same as it's been on all the Celtics' free agent
signings this
offseason=97enough with the role players, get some studs.
Boston
went into this offseason with nearly $10 million in play
money and got
more when they traded Williams. Unless they get awfully
lucky, they
haven't gotten a single player who will appear in an
All-Star game
from their investment. They opted to kinda-sorta fill
the frontcourt
with role players Travis Knight, Andrew DeClercq, Tony
Massenburg and Bruce Bowen and then picked up Mills for
the small
forward spot. The free agents available this summer
obviously weren't
the stuff fairy tales are made of; Mills and Knight were
two of the
better guys out there (unless you think the Celtics had
a shot at
Michael Jordan, ha ha). But the moves will effectively
eliminate
Boston from the free agent party next year, when several
of the games
biggest young stars (including Kevin Garnett, Joe Smith,
Antonio
McDyess, Rasheed Wallace, Penny Hardaway, Damon=
Stoudamire
and Christian Laettner) become free agents.
This isn't to say the Celtics won't be a better team
next year. They'll
be much better. For starters, they only win 15 games
last year when
their Expected Wins total was 23. But more importantly,
they had
two of the first six picks in the draft and have added
four free agents
since then. There's simply no way they won't be
significantly
improved, regardless of what I think of their offseason
free agent
strategy. The players they signed are all young, so the
odds are with
the Celtics that guys like Mills, Knight and Edney are
going to
improve over the next few years. Both Knight and Mills
are decent
players already (both have ARFs above 44; a quality
starter will be
around 45), and both are young enough to take steps
forward.
A lot of folks have written in asking me to reconsider
my harsh
comments on the Eric Williams trade in light of the
Chris Mills
signing. Obviously, given a choice between Williams and
Mills they
did the right thing in ditching Williams. What I have a
problem with is
how the Celtics have managed their cap money this summer
so that
they have had to lose two players they wanted to=
keep=97Eric
Williams and Rick Fox. The reason the Celtics lost
Williams was
because they gave Andrew DeClercq 5 years and $8.5=
million;
players like DeClercq are not exactly a rare commodity
and the de
facto statement coming from Boston, if you look at their
moves, is
that DeClercq was a higher priority and better player
than Williams.
That's the part that makes me question what the Celtics
are doing=97
that and the "quantity over quality" approach that they
are taking to
the free agent market.