[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: disjointed
> OK. Now I'm with you :-)
> Yeah, I agree. I really don't know the reason, it could just be that
> they're feeling their way around with each other still. Surely John was
> able to hold things together and his presence is sorely missed at times.
Well, I don't know what you two are talking about. What does a "dis-
jointed" sound mean? I haven't heard anything "disjointed."
And if you're just talking about the band losing its place during a song -
why that happened when John was still alive, too!
Besides the occasional flub, I think the current band is tighter than the
2000 version. And that has nothing to do with John either. It's got a lot
to do with Pete & Zak, who are getting more comfortable & "in tune"
with each other every day.
- SCHRADE in Akron