Re[2]: My stupid theory

[Brian.Cady@turner.com]

^^But why this sudden burst of activity on "old" projects?  He's been
^^(more or less) free from The Who for fourteen years now.  If being with 
^^The Who
^^didn't allow him to work on these things, why did it take him so long to get 
^^back
^^to them?

^^H&K
^^AThosWhite

        Here's my guess based on the chronology.  In 1991 into 1992, Pete was 
working on his "new" project Psychoderelict (even if it contained some old 
material).  Shortly after this he was pulled into the Broadway Tommy project.  
What came out of this?  A Tony Award, lotsa money, and probably a lot of people 
who were willing to green light more Pete projects, as long as they were based 
on the old stuff.  This, and the expense and lack of interest in Psychoderelict,
undoubtedly pointed Pete in the direction of pulling out and dusting off "the 
same old song" so to speak.
Received: from internet.turner.com by ccmail.turner.com with SMTP
  (IMA Internet Exchange v1.04a) id 1b35dd60; Mon, 3 Jun 96 17:49:11 -0400
Received: from smap@localhost by internet.turner.com
	for <Brian.Cady@turner.com> via smapdV1.3
	id QAA13907; Mon, 3 Jun 1996 16:22:31 -0400
Received: from gateway.mpath.com by interlock.turner.com
	for <Brian.Cady@turner.com> via SMTP (smap V1.3)
	id sma013846; Mon Jun  3 16:22:24 1996
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by gateway.mpath.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA2122
0 for TheWho-outgoing; Mon, 3 Jun 1996 12:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emout16.mail.aol.com (emout16.mx.aol.com [198.81.11.42]) by gatewa
y.mpath.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA21092 for <thewho@mpath.com>; Mon, 3 Ju
n 1996 12:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: AThosWhite@aol.com
Received: by emout16.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id PAA20515 for thewho@mpath.co
m; Mon, 3 Jun 1996 15:29:36 -0400
 Sun Dec  7 14:57:47 PST 1997
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 1996 15:29:36 -0400
Message-ID: <960603152936_548381101@emout16.mail.aol.com>
To: thewho@mpath.com
Subject: Re: My stupid theory
Sender: owner-thewho@mpath.com
Precedence: bulk