[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: balls

>Taken as a group they're not bad looking.  Except for Roger, the Who 
>doesn't have that glossy surface chick appeal factor.  (Remember the bit 
>about the early auditions where the band was encouraged to "lose the ugly 
>guy with the big nose"?)

John's the best-looking member of TED.  Roger's is actually very 
strange-looking, and it's his personality the gals respond to.


>but all the shows I've been to were mostly male, with the exceptions being 
>wonderful people like Corkface, Who Babe!, Lauren, Stephanie, etc.

Thanks for the recognition.  I think The Who fans in general are a great 
bunch.  :)


>Maybe the Who doesn't attract many chicks, but the ones they do attract are 
>definately chicks worth knowing in my book :-).

I've been trying to figure it out.  Pete says the Who gals are all 
Weimaraners.  Another vision?  Are we all big, solid dogs with a nasty bite? 
  ;)


keets

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com