[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: speed limiter



If the springs are changed, or your airbox has been modified, that will put
you into SCCA Street Prepared, which looks like a pretty tough category. You
might also check out the "Street Touring" class.

See http://www.moutons.org/sccasolo/ for a good listing of car classes,
modifications allowed, etc.

Tim Irwin
'98 Jetta GLX
http://www.members.cascade.org/~tjirwin/tim.htm


-----Original Message-----
From: Alexxi [mailto:alexxi@magma.ca]
Sent: Friday, October 22, 1999 11:04 AM
To: jettaglx@igtc.com
Subject: RE: speed limiter


Interesting.... and good point.  I guess it depends on how strict the
officials are.

 I was curious to know as I'm considering getting into Autocross next
summer myself.  My car came with suspension and air box mod'd which would
still let me compete in stock or near stock category. 


At 09:52 AM 10/22/99 -0700, you wrote:
>True, and I may get called on it if I campaigned nationally (little chance
>of that). As you may have seen on earlier posts, I intend to follow the
>rules quite closely. However, this would be a modification with no effect
>whatsoever on the speeds seen in Autocross (<70MPH), and I could argue that
>there is nothing in the rules that disallows such a modification (engine
>timing changes as done by A/M chips are specifically disallowed in some
>classes). Similarly, the euro headlights -- which I would like to get when
I
>have the money -- could be considered a modification, but would have no
>effect on performance.
>
>While either change _could_ be technically illegal, I don't see how they
>would conflict with the spirit of the rules, which would be to disallow any
>change which would either enhance performance or deny a manufacture's
>advertising/identity (i.e. de-badging). In my mind this is a different case
>than a change which could be concealed well enough not to be discovered,
but
>would enhance performance.
>
>It is probably a moot point anyway, as I would be amazed if they were
>willing to make the change (though I can argue it from a safety point of
>view, and I know the owner of the dealership is familiar with SIR as he
>races a vintage Porsche 917).
>
>As a side discussion, I know that several of the BMW tuners use the ODBII
>port to re-program the stock chip. Does anyone know why none of the VW
>tuners do the same?
>
>Tim Irwin
>'98 Jetta GLX
>c
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alexxi [mailto:alexxi@magma.ca]
>Sent: Friday, October 22, 1999 9:22 AM
>To: jettaglx@igtc.com
>Subject: RE: speed limiter
>
>
>Just playing devil's advocate but even if the dealer could alter the chip,
>wouldn't it still be considered a modified chip as far as the rules go ?
>Technically it would no longer be a stock chip found in normal production
>vehicles. 
>
>
>
>At 09:01 AM 10/22/99 -0700, you wrote:
>>My thoughts exactly. I'd be looking at an aftermarket chip except that I'm
>>also getting into autocross, and don't feel like spending the money to be
>>competitive in SP, so I'll need to stay stock. I guess I'll just have to
>>watch it on the track. Turn 1 has an elevation drop at the apex that makes
>>it even more critical to be accelerating through it. Of course the first
>>time the instructor told me to keep my foot in it (at 120, foot on the
>>floor), my brain objected, but it handled beautifully.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Alexxi [mailto:alexxi@magma.ca]
>>Sent: Friday, October 22, 1999 8:48 AM
>>To: jettaglx@igtc.com
>>Subject: RE: speed limiter
>>
>>
>>I can guarantee that no dealer who cares to stay in business is going to
>>touch the speed limiter. Even so, it would be cheaper to buy a chip with a
>>higher limit from Neuspeed, Garett.... considering the labour charges at
>>the shop. 
>>
>>My 95 has ODBI so it may perform differently than yours. When it hits the
>>limiter just past 220km/135 mph it feels like the engine just died  for a
>>second and a half.  By the time the power comes back on you're down about

>>10km/hr. Not what you want happening in the middle of a turn. 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>At 08:17 AM 10/22/99 -0700, you wrote:
>>>When I was at SIR (soapbox on - a safe and legal place to do such speeds
-
>>>soapbox off), I was running the front straight at about 120MPH
(indicated)
>>>before the turn-in to turn 1. In 4th, I think that was around 6k RPM. The
>>>instructor then had me go into 5th on the straight after that, so that I
>>>didn't bounce off of the rev limiter as I accelerated through turn 1. I
>>>think 120 MPH was about 5000 RPM in 5th.
>>>
>>>BTW, the front straight was the place to take several deep breaths,
loosen
>>>your grip on the steering wheel, dry your hands, check your gauges, and
>>>review a couple of items with the instructor -- all while accelerating up
>>to
>>>120+. The instructor and I could talk comfortably (with helmets on)
>through
>>>the front straight. On the track at over 100 MPH it felt like I was
>driving
>>>down a good section of I-405 at 70 MPH.
>>>
>>>For those who have bounced off of the speed limiter, what is it like?
Does
>>>it cut out and stutter a little like the rev-limiter, or does it just
hold
>>>the speed?
>>>
>>>Considering that ODBII is supposed to be fully programmable via the
>>>diagnostic port, anyone want to consider the likelyhood that I can get a
>>>dealer to raise the limiter? I really would rather not bounce off of it
in
>>a
>>>tight situation that requires continued acceleration (like turn 1 at
SIR).
>>>
>>>Tim Irwin
>>>'98 GLX
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Christopher Cooley [mailto:chriscooley@worldnet.att.net]
>>>Sent: Thursday, October 21, 1999 10:02 PM
>>>To: jettaglx@igtc.com
>>>Subject: Re: speed limiter (was Notchy Shifter)
>>>
>>>
>>>OK list...I've got to ask:
>>>
>>>So I'm flyin' at 125, can't remember what the tach read since my tunnel
>>>vision
>>>was pretty narrow at night.  Coming up Hwy 101N. around Whipple, near the
>>>CHP
>>>station.  Not too smart, but what was I to do with a VTEC Integra in the
>#2
>>>lane.  Nice little spin we're having, when I remember the list saying the
>
>>>fuel
>>>kicks out at 130, for us non-G-chip suffering mortals.  Even still, the
>>Revs
>>>MUST have been in excess of 6K?
>>>
>>>This CAN'T be good..regardless of what y'all say.  I've nervous about
over
>>>reving my VR6, to the point where 5K is about it.  In 1st, 2nd, and 3rd;
>5K
>>>is
>>>about all it takes to easily play with other folks.
>>>
>>>Anyway, your thoughts on what is best for performance, with respect to
>>>engine
>>>life tolerance, is appreciated.
>>>
>>>"what's too much"
>>>
>>>
>>>D.J. Bergesen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey, Flyin. I ain't sayin' yer' lyin'!
>>>>
>>>> Alls I knows is that I gots up to 130, staring at 145, when the fuel
>>>cut-off
>>>> kicked in. Mine's a 96.5+ Jetta GLX. I WANTED to hit 150. That's why I
>>>have
>>>> Z rated tires. WHAT'S WRONG????
>>>>
>>>> Herr VWaffe
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________________
>>>> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>>> 
>> 
>