Re: [Celtics' Stuff Payton will be looking for a ring

["Sean Giovanello" <sgiovanello@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

You can also phrase that as a three time all-star, power forward who can
beat you off the dribble, help run the offense due to his ball-handling and
passing skills, and brings a whole lot of leadership to a team.  Most teams,
I would imagine, see Walker for what he is...an fairly unique player (by NBA
standards) who brings a hell of a lot more to the table than he takes off.

One of the problems on this list is that many of the posters look to score
cheap points and/or either denigrate/praise everything about the Cs.  It
really hampers the discourse when many people on here have an agenda and are
sticking to it.  I have been on here for a while and it seems to intelligent
basketball talk is almost drowned out by the drivel.  I truly wish there was
a basketball version of the Sons of Sam Horn...
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James A. Hill" <jahill@leasingservice.com>
To: "Celtics (E-mail)" <celtics@igtc.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2003 11:32 PM
Subject: RE: [Celtics' Stuff Payton will be looking for a ring


> Heck, checking reality would be a good start.  Why would Chicago even want
> Walker?  You need a team that needs an undersized, leaping challenged,
> outside playing, max contract PF to consider a trade with.  Chicago
"ain't"
> one of them.  Not sure who is.
>
> <Jim
>
>
> >You guys really should check RealGM before proposing trades.  These
> salaries don't add up.
> >And before anyone says "cap crap", to balance this Walker deal, even
> without Delk, would require the addition of Eddie >Robinson or Donyell
> Marshall.
>
> >>On Sat, 24 May 2003 22:13:30 -0700 John Lyell  wrote:
> ><I was thinking a Walker and say Delk for Williams , Fizer or Robinson,
and
> >>Hassell would work.