[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re:Another opening another show?



At 12:57 PM 6/14/2003 -0400, Eggcentric@aol.com wrote:
However, could it still be possible that Chicago would come in under the
cap next season as their present 2003-04 team salary is only $42.9  mill
and no one knows yet what the exact salary cap/luxury tax will be for
2003-04?  If that be true, then the trade could fly. If not, how about
them adding a few bucks in fodder to cement the proposed deal?

If the league could only announce each season's financial restraints
in ADVANCE instead of AFTER THE FACT, all teams might know where
they stood budget-wise and trade-wise in advance of their moves.
I think you're confusing the salary cap and the luxury tax. The cap IS set the summer before the season, around when the FA period opens mid July. It's the luxury tax that can't be set in advance **as currently structured**, mainly because it needs actual salary figures and revenue figures for the applicable season. So it wouldn't matter if Chicago would be under sometime next season if we want to deal now.

It really is a horribly flawed, confusing, and frustrating system.
As has been every version of the CBA because it's the results of politicking between two sides who don't trust each other and are extremely greedy rather than a real attempt to work together for a best solution in any objective sense. Not quite as bad as the animosity between the two sides in baseball, but getting closer all the time.

Kim