Re: Re: To CB--No, not Charlie Brown...

[DJB <dajubo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Why say that the Cs were upset at Barkley? It sounded more like good-natured ribbing to me. In addition, its different, because Barkley is neutral, whereas Heinsohn is part of the organization.

-David

-------Original Message-------
From: Shawn Niles <shizzjr@hotmail.com>
Sent: 01/21/03 11:49 AM
To: snoopy1@pig.net, Celtics@igtc.com
Subject: Re: To CB--No, not Charlie Brown...

> 
> In all fairness, isn't the Celtics getting upset at Barkley the same as the 

Magic getting upset at Tommy last month? Everyone ripped the Magic for
that, 
but now you like it that Paul went after Charles?






>From: snoopy1@pig.net
>To: Celtics@igtc.com
>CC: Celticsstuffgroup@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: To CB--No, not Charlie Brown...
>Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 23:37:29 -0500
>
>Charles Barkley--
>
>Hey, Round Mound of Sound--
>
>Celtics don't roll over.
>
>They PICK and roll.
>
>Thought you'd know that after the number of times the Celtics kicked YOUR
>butt.  :>))
>
>Snoopy the Celtics Beagle
>Please visit the
><http://users.mfi.net/fluteaphrael/celticsbeagle/celtics.html>Celtics
>Beagle 
><http://users.mfi.net/fluteaphrael/celticsbeagle/celtics.html>website


_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus