Re: Cousy

["Cecil Wright" <cecil@hfx.eastlink.ca>]

No prob.  I have been guilty of a misunderstanding or two or three before.
And you're right in that I should have specified that I meant Kidd's heart,
not the Cooz.

Cecil



----- Original Message -----
From: "Kim Malo" <kimmalo@mindspring.com>
To: "Cecil Wright" <cecil@hfx.eastlink.ca>; "Celts" <celtics@igtc.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: Cousy


> Cecil-
>
> At 01:46 PM 5/26/02 -0700, Cecil Wright wrote:
> >I am unsure if you were directing all of your remarks to me or not,
however,
> >allow me to say the following:
> >
> >My comments regarding the Cooz were rather complimentary toward he and
Kidd.
> >My questioning Kidd's heart
>
> OOPS. My mistake. I thought you were questioning Cousy's heart, which it
> honestly did look like you were saying in the context of the thread and
> because you only spoke of he, never naming Kidd as the subject, as if in a
> continuation of your prior paragraph about Cous..
>
> >My other comment regards the treatment of Antoine.  I am not sure how
long
> >you have been on this list, but if anyone who has been here for any
length
> >of time tells you that I drilled Antoine for being too emotional last
year,
> >they are lying to you.  I have been one of the few who supported Toine
> >through everything from supposed selfishness and worrying only about
> >personal stats, to Pitino, to versatility, to improving his free throw
> >percentage dramatically, to the wiggle, etc.
>
> Well  on this one II did say *WE* i.e. Cs fans in general. I didn't say
you
> in particular or even you meant to be a generalization, but open to
> misunderstanding. And I don't think you (particular) can argue with there
> having been widespread condemnation.
>
> On the list a while ago under a prior email, off for a while after a
> computer crash and annoyance with some stuff about the list, back on this
> year. So yeah, you were a name I certainly knew, along with the general
> tenor of your thoughts. Which means that going back to the Cooz point I
was
> actually pretty shocked at what I thought you were saying.
>
> >By the way, for those who may have overlooked this fact, the backcourt
> >employed by the C's for the 11-0 run to start the 4th qtr was Kenny and
> >Delk.  In fact, they played the entire quarter.  The only sub used was
> >Rodney who came in for Battie with 6:43 reamining and went the rest of
the
> >way.
>
> Yeah, I know. I was shuddering. And then didn't Delk out-rebound some of
> the big boys just to spite me : )
>
> Again, sorry for misunderstanding over whose heart you were questioning.