Re: Where Do We Go From Here?

["Cecil Wright" <cecil@hfx.eastlink.ca>]

Yeah I hope he continues to suck with 12 pts including 2/3 from downtown the
rest of the season.  We could do a lot worse than that off the bench.

Cecil



----- Original Message -----
From: "Kestas" <Kestutis.Kveraga@dartmouth.edu>
To: <celtics@igtc.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: Where Do We Go From Here?


> At 21:39 3/13/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> >Aside from Pierce and Walker who kept us close in the early going, Eric
> >Williams had himself a game.
>
> No, he didn't. I thought we were going to lose the game because Obie
> insisted on keeping him in the game even though he was complete garbage
> offensively and nobody else was scoring besides Walker and Pierce. Believe
> me, his line looks a lot better than his game did tonight. Still he made a
> big steal and a huge 3 at the end, so I guess Obie's faith in him was
> justified.
>
> > KA an awful nite shooting but 10 assists out did
> >the Kidd.
>
> Yeah, right. This is just more evidence that the assist statistic (rather,
> the way it's kept) is completely meaningless. Kenny and Kidd weren't even
> on the same planet tonight. Kenny basically sucked, although he, like
EWill
> made a couple of good plays at the end. Kidd is only the best PG and pure
> basketball player since ??? He's just unbelievable. Stats can't describe
> him. If there's any rhyme or reason to the MVP vote, he HAS to be voted
the
> MVP.
>
> > Pot's bless him, 12 boards. For a man so intent and a hard worker, a
> >shame the Creator didn't give him some touch.
>
> Yeah, he's a stiff's stiff. But as long as he's a rebounding stiff, I can
> live with it. Alas, most nights he isn't.
>
> >Seemed like OB subbed creatively, what's the report on him that saw the
game?
>
> I thought Obie was going to lose the game with his subbing. Since Delk and
> Rogers didn't immediately produce, he put them on the bench and went with
> the old boys down the stretch. So it was back to the Pierce-and-Walker
> show. This is another reason why this win was so significant - we won with
> two players playing well and one guy rebounding well. The rest basically
> sucked. Yet we still won, because it was the right two players who were
> hot, we held our own on the boards, and played pretty good D.  This is
good
> news, because we can expect the supporting cast, namely Kenny, Delk and
> Rogers, to do better offensively on most nights.
> Kestas