RE: Delk For Daniels Almost As Bad As Anderson For Olowokandi Tal k

["James A. Hill" <jahill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

If I could figure out how to catch-and-release while hunting I would join
them.  I have the waders and beer....

To answer your question, it depends.  If we are talking a top tier PG, I
think it would be great.  A second-third tier PG, not that critical.

The "designed offense" would need to change with a top PG.  The other guys
would have to be moving and be watching for the pass leading them to the
open shot.

If Walker thinks he is a better ball handler then the PG, as in the
second-third tier point, then it won't matter, he will control the ball.

I knock Walker for his shot selection and a variety of other things he
does/doesn't do, but I can also see why it would be hard to give up control
on the court to guys with lesser skills then him.

With his hands and mobility, give him a top PG who he will accept running
the team and he stays an All Star for a long time.

<Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Kim Malo [mailto:kimmalo@mindspring.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 1:32 PM
To: James A. Hill; Celtics (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Delk For Daniels Almost As Bad As Anderson For Olowokandi
Tal k


At 11:59 AM 7/27/02 -0400, James A. Hill wrote:
>Or you could just say that "Just because he quacks like a duck, it doesn't
>make him a duck."

<Big Grin> True.
Some of the best quackers I know of aren't ducks at all, they're just
pulling on waders as an excuse to drink some beer while hunting  down
dinner.

Throw out question to the list - given the number of guys we have in other
positions who can handle and pass at least a bit, notably our co-captain
point forward, how critical do others think it is to have a good, solid PG.

Kim