RE: 6 for 21? 2 for 10??

[OzerskyJA <OzerskyJA@cmog.org>]

I agree completely.

Josh Ozersky	
Marketing Communications Specialist 
Corning Museum of Glass

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	I am. . . Anonymous [SMTP:ktoreed@yahoo.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, March 28, 2001 3:49 PM
> To:	celtics@igtc.com
> Subject:	Re: 6 for 21?  2 for 10??
> 
> <<<  what I liked the most about captains Walker and
> Pierce this week is how mature and team-spirited
> they...
> <<<
> 
> The only duo that scores more than Walker/Pierce is
> Shaq/Kobe.  And we all know that Shaq and Kobe haven't
> been able to co-exist with each other peacefully.  Our
> stars compliment each other because Walker is so
> versatile and has been willing to adjust his role to
> compliment Pierce's game. 
> 
> What a lot of people fail to grasp is that if Walker
> spends all his time down low, he may get more rebounds
> and score more efficiently but Pierce's offensive
> efficiency would go down.  Of course, this is a
> subjective analysis on my part but I believe it to be
> true.  Shaq demanding the ball in the post.... but
> Kobe has the ball and is looking to create off the
> dribble...conflict!  Clyde and Hakeem worked excellent
> together because Clyde was an excellent passer and was
> willing to yield the post to Hakeem and settle for -
> gasp - a lot of 3s and assists and boards... Kinda
> like Walker now.
> 
> We have a dynamic duo in Walker/Pierce and should
> build around them. 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text