RE: Do not draft a PG

[OzerskyJA <OzerskyJA@cmog.org>]

I agree.  I also think that the PG position in Boston isn't nearly as
restrictive
as Kenny makes it out to be.  Put a fast, gifted, uptempo guard out there
and you'll see guys begin to fill the lanes.  Even a journeyman like Milt,
just
by virtue of being a little bit aggressive, was able to loosen up our
offense.  A
good young PG like Cook or Parker will definitely get guys some easy baskets
--
something Kenny never does, no matter where he is.

-----Original Message-----
From: Douglas342@AOL.com [mailto:Douglas342@AOL.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 2:41 PM
To: j.hironaka@unesco.org; kevinlok@yahoo.com; celtics@igtc.com
Subject: Re: Do not draft a PG


In a message dated 6/26/01 10:53:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
j.hironaka@unesco.org writes: 




If Boston wants to address the long-term PG situation via this particular 
draft, they might be best off looking instead to groom over several years a 
natural sharp-shooter (Forte, Arenas types) into a solid complementary 
ballhandler,



Not another undersized 2 guard who you want to turn into a point!  Please!

Dee Brown couldn't do it, Chauncy Billups couldn't do it.  And Gilbert
Arenas 
won't do it.