RE: Monter's mock draft has . . .

[kai_brunnen_g@ix.netcom.com]

Are you sure this is Monter's mock draft? 
I don't think Chris Monter is affiliated with NBAdraft.net.

Whatever the case, C's need to find a way to trade up to
4) Griffen or 8) Randolph. 

This is not the year to need a point guard, as this draft has only two
going in the first round.

I would not take Tinsley at 10 or 11 - that's a reach.
Bradley on the other hand, may be a sleeper.

My draft strategy might be to threaten to take Tinsley at 10/11,
so that one or more of the 9 lottery teams above me who need
a point guard, will consider trading down.
  
Ray

> ** Original Subject: RE: Monter's mock draft has  . . .
> ** Original Sender: CeltsSteve@AOL.com
> ** Original Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 10:24:47 -0700

> ** Original Message follows... 

>
> three high schoolers going 1, 2, and 3 with Battier going at #7. 
> 
> He also has the C's taking Michael Bradley at #10 and Jamaal Tinsley at #11 
> but doesn't correctly list the C's with their third pick  further down in the 
> first round.
> 
> He has Satterfield going at the top of the 2nd round to Chicago (Why when 
> they already have Crawford??). From what I've seen of him vs. what I've seen 
> of Tinsley, I'd rather see the C's try to draft Satterfield. I'd prefer Frank 
> Williams of Illinois over both of them. Assuming, of course, that Jason 
> Williams does not declare.
> 
> <A HREF="http://www.nbadraft.net/">http://www.nbadraft.net/</A>
> 


>** --------- End Original Message ----------- **

>