Re: Vote on Fortson

["John Lyell" <johnlyell@hotmail.com>]

No I see it two ways. Pitino brought fortson in to play the 4, so AW could
move to the 3. Both have not worked out.  Mcgrady is more of the athletic
slasher for the 3 spot we need. As someone else mentioned with mercer,
sometimes you have to make moves to try and improve chemisty. Although I am
not sure AW for Mcgrady does.

I would love to get Alvin Williams. he has played decent at the point and
would definitely better than anything we have backing up Anderson. He's a
scrapper.




 it would be more a chemistry thing, though I am
----- Original Message -----
From: W <titans@ihug.com.au>
To: John Lyell <johnlyell@hotmail.com>
Cc: Cecil Wright <cecil@hfx.eastlink.ca>; <celtics@igtc.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2000 1:32 AM
Subject: Re: Vote on Fortson


>
>
> John Lyell wrote:
>
> > Gotta go with Cecil here. Stewart looked impressive at times last year
but
> > he has not matured a bit. He sucked big time in the summer league
getting
> > outplayed by guys like Sean Marks. If we think Battie is bad at least
Tony
> > has some offensive ability.
> >
> > Would you do McGrady and Alvin Williams for Walker and Barros and keep
> > Fortson or Battie at the 4 spot ?
>
> No thanks........ Antoine still has a lot of unfulfilled potential, as
does
> McGrady, but if the reasoning behind doing the Walker for McGrady trade is
> potential, then you're absolutely stupid [Note: that wasn't meant as an
insult
> John!!]
>
> W
>
>