[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Would You Trade Kenny Anderson For Latrell Sprewell?
- To: celtics@igtc.com
- Subject: Re: Would You Trade Kenny Anderson For Latrell Sprewell?
- From: Way Of The Ray <wayray@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 19:46:19 -0400
- Organization: Way of The Ray
- References: <19991015232711.10051.rocketmail@web123.yahoomail.com>
- Sender: owner-celtics@igtc.com
Subject: Re: Would You Trade Kenny Anderson For Latrell Sprewell?
> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 18:42:48 EDT
> From: Georgek27@aol.com
> To: celtics@igtc.com
>
> In a message dated 10/15/99 4:06:10 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> wayray@ix.netcom.com writes:
>
> << - He's a tremendous force on the court...........when not on suspension
> and I can envision a few of them in Boston.
But he's only here for one season...
> - He will only be here for one year........then what? where would we be with
> the cap?
$7 million per year less in contracts...
> If Fotson and/or Battie were resigned we'd still be over it - wouldn't we?
Yeah, but $7 million less over the cap. Every little bit helps and this
is
a nice chunk. Battie signed for $25 million plus incentives for 6 years.
> - Pitino needs to make the playoffs....adding a ball hog probably not the
> answer and then who plays point? Barros & Turner?
I think he's a lot less selfish than people make him out to be....
> - Pitino needs to dump Anderson's contract....yes but with the cap
> restraints what then?
George, one contract removal at a time.
> - He'll make the Celtics a better team....more dangerous yes? (especially in
> a dark alley) but better? I'm not sure. I can see a very volatile chemistry
> ready to explode.
Its for one season, not a lifetime.
> - And there's always someone else willing to trade for him....maybe not
> after more suspensions and another assault on a coach. Unless it's for cap
> reasons during the season and then it would negate most of your other reasons.
A sign and trade maybe, and Latrell's going to be on his best behavior
during the season, plus since its his contract year, he'll be
overachieiving.
Ray
> I don't want anything to do with this self-absorbed problem child. Why do
> you think the Knicks want to deal him after last year's playoff run? I'd
> give them Kenny for Childs and a healthy Dudley because that would at least
> give us someone else to play the point and to back up at center. Trading
> Kenny for nothing would only help Gaston's budget. We'd really have to hope
> Turner could be the steal of the draft (for the past decade!).
> George