Re: Maybe it's just me, but

[Dan Forant Sr <dforant1@nycap.rr.com>]

No doubt it was a worse call. It didn't even seem close. It can't be easy
reffing some of these games, especially the replays after if they get to
watch them on the highlite films. So they've evened out.

At 06:49 AM 6/7/99 PDT, you wrote:
>I'm glad someone noticed that.  I was only half watching, and I couldn't 
>believe when I saw they had given LJ the three.  I was even more amazed that 
>the announcers didn't even question it.  I'm not surprised, however, that 
>the NY papers failed to notice it.  And yes, Dan F., it is part of the game 
>and every team gets calls sometimes.  But, if you're going to go on about 
>calls that Indiana got, that means you have to listen to us when New York 
>gets them.  And this one was pretty bad.
>
>Jim
>
>
>>From: Georgek27@aol.com
>
>>Different topic under the same heading:  Maybe it's just me (since I really 
>>hate the Knicks) but besides the ticky-tack nature of the foul on LJ he was 
>>not in the act of shooting and took his sweet time after the foul to set up 
>>and launch that 3 pointer. I think a new >record was set for continuance on 
>>that play.  Not a mention in the NY papers, the announcers questioned the 
>>validity of the foul but
>>not the continuance, but finally I heard the morning host on NY's WFAN 
>>remark about the "10 minute" continuance granted to LJ so maybe I'm not 
>>crazy.
>>
>>George
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________
>Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
>
>
>