Re: Profile Of The Warrior's Todd Fuller

[Sherry & Hart <hartleyo@ix.netcom.com>]

Mister Ghost wrote:
> 
> The words productive and DeClerq can best be classified as a oxymoron.
> I'll agree DeClerq will probably be an adequate back-up power forward
> during the upcoming season or next season, but as a center, he's
> undersized and underweight, and at best a third-string guy.  In fact,
> if the season is cancelled, I can see Ben Pepper being the backup next
> November.  I think, if Fuller was given the same opportunities as
> DeClerq
> with Pitino as his coach, he would be a better player than Andrew.
> MG
> 
> ---Icarus <skmishra@sprintmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > There is a difference, Fuller last year played behind Dampier and
> Spencer
> > and played a lot during garbage time while DeClerq played productive
> minutes
> > for the C's. Regarding trade, Spencer still has some trade value
> Fuller
> > doesn't, GS doesn't need any of them because they are convinced that
> Dampier
> > is their answer at center and they are dime a dozen center's that
> can be had
> > cheap for minimum.
> >                                                               - Mishra
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mister Ghost <mister_ghost@yahoo.com>
> >
> >
> > >Todd Fuller averages one foul every 6.88 minutes of playing time;
> > >Andrew DeClerq averages one foul every 5.49 minutes of playing time.
> > >So he is more foul prone that Fuller.  From what I've read, Golden
> State
> > >is planning to deal Felton Spencer, not Fuller.
> > >MG

If Fuller is so good, why didn't he get more playing time on one of the
worst teams in the league last year.
Regards,
Hart