RE: RP on Barros

[Cecil Wright <nocw1@nsh.library.ns.ca>]

What are you basing it on?  I don't think statistically any of them are 
better.  In fact, and I don't have anything to back this up, I don't 
think any of them, with the possible exception of Nash, can shoot like 
Dana.  He's improving at a position he's never had to play before and 
he's got heart.

Cecil 

On Sat, 11 Apr 1998, John Lyell wrote:

> I agree Fisher, Nash & Eisley are definitely better at the point position.
> 
> 
> On Friday, April 10, 1998 9:08 AM, Jeremy Warren [SMTP:jeremy.warren@alphatech.com] wrote:
> >                       RE>RP on Barros                              4/10/98
> > 
> > I'll assume that he meant he wouldn't trade Dana for any other backup point
> > guard.  But I still have to disagree.  I would rather have Howard Eisley,
> > Derek Fisher, Steve Nash, and Eric Murdock than Dana Barros.  Is there anyone
> > I'm forgetting?
> > 
> > Jeremy
> > 
> > Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1998 10:54:32 -0500
> > From: Theresa Lee <tjoyce@mit.edu>
> > Subject: RP on Barros
> > 
> > During the pregame show last night, Pitino talked about Dana Barros. He
> > said that is the best backup point guard in the league and he would not
> > trade him for any other point guard in the league. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
>