RE: Why Dana?

[John Lyell <Jlyell@concentric.net>]

If anyone has watched this team this year and says it ain't broke I had to 
question their logic.  Even though we won some more games we still have a 
long way to go.  We have no low post D, no consistent 3 point threat, and 
although the D is tough, we still give up a lot of easy hoops and got 
pounded by Miami a couple of times.

We are getting close but still have a way to go.


:
>
> (Document link not converted)
>
> All I got to say is,
> If ain't broke, don't fix it.
>
> Ritesh Ramani
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >Though Dana is making alot of money, I don't think we should trade him
> >unless we get something of value for him.  As a Celtic fan, I could 
>care
> >less about whether we trade one of our players to a team that can use 
>him
> or
> >not.
> After making the Billups and Brown trade, Kenny has experienced knee
> problems.  Though all reports have indicated that this is not a serious
> injury, anything which will limit his mobility is cause for concern in my
> book.  I know I am not the only person who is really scared that he may 
not
> return to his previous level, but nobody wants to say it.
> Dana, has no more defensive liabilities that does Kenny, but we have been
> so
> happy with his addition to the team that we've overlooked some decent
> minutes from Barros, and to a lesser degree, Edney.  Unless we can get 
Mike
> Bibby in the draft, I wouldn't unload Barros so quickly, and even if we
> were
> in a position to snare Bibby, should we when consensus seems to be that 
we
> should go for the beef?  I think that would make for an interesting
> decision
> for RP and CW.
> Cecil
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shailendra K. Mishra <skmishra@dlsun660.us.oracle.com>
> To: celtics@igtc.COM <celtics@igtc.COM>; leonelq@quetal.net
> <leonelq@quetal.net>
> Date: Monday, April 06, 1998 4:22 PM
> Subject: Re: Why Dana?
>
> >Two reasons:
> >
> >a) He is too expensive for a bench player.
> >b) He deserves a starting PG's job, I can name five teams whose starting
> PG's
> >are worse then Dana e.g. Denver, Vancouver, Toronto, Clippers, 
Sacramento.
> >                               - Mishra
> >> From owner-celtics@igtc.COM Mon Apr  6 11:31:01 1998
> >
> >>
> >> I say we keep Dana, he will play some great minutes coming off the 
bench
> >> next season.
> >>
> >> If we want to free some cap, lets do it with Knight, Pervis, Minor,
> Jones
> >> (both) and Tabak.
> >>
> >>
> >> Bring Mohamed!!!!!!
> >>
> >>
> >> Alejandro
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>