Re: Phoenix House disappointment

[Ken in MD <seahawkman2001@xxxxxxxxx>]

keets wrote: >>I'll bet the Phonenix victims would be
screaming just as loud if Pete had admitted to viewing
without paying, even if it was legal. This is great
free publicity for their cause.<<

Yes, I'm sure that's how they view it, keets.
Publicity for their cause. Right.  

>>I agree that his reponse should have been a stronger
one. He should have blasted the Phoenix victims right
out of the water. Well, figuratively, anyway.<<

Uh huh, that would help Pete's cause immensely. His
sarcastic presumption to victimhood already does that.
 I can't believe this is the same keets that
publicized the Michael Malone article and urged us all
to fight against child abuse web sites.  

Pete's 'branded' entry has all the markings of a Sex
Addict in denial.  Yes, the Caution confirms the
consistency of his version of events but it also
signifies that he went over the line. His attitude
since he was free to speak, and remarks like yours, do
nothing but rub salt in the wounds of the victims he's
professed to support.

Ken

=====
I SUPPORT PETE TOWNSHEND.
NO 'What Ifs' NECESSARY. 
.
.
.
.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com