[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Pete arrested (heard at 3pm Boston time)

To: "thewho@xxxxxxxx" <thewho@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Pete arrested (heard at 3pm Boston time)
From: fox <l.van.kammen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 23:03:13 +0100
In-reply-to: <200301132126.QAA28486@world.std.com>
Reply-to: thewho@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-thewho@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1309

Charged is something different to being guilty. Keep that in mind.

lars

On 13-01-2003 22:26, "Carl A Biancucci" <carl@world.std.com> wrote:

> I am BUMMING!!!
> Am giving Pete the benefit of the doubt for now,but...
> supposedly he's charged with possesion of kiddie porn,
> making images of kiddie porn,and intention to distribute
> kiddie porn.
> 
> I am hoping this is all a terrible mistake.....

References:
- Pete arrested (heard at 3pm Boston time)
  - From: Carl A Biancucci

Prev by Date: RE: Pete arrested (heard at 3pm Boston time)
Next by Date: Re: This latest scandal
Previous by thread: RE: Pete arrested (heard at 3pm Boston time)
Next by thread: Re: Pete arrested (heard at 3pm Boston time)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread