Hey, english boy

[Sroundtable@aol.com]

In a message dated 10/30/2001 8:10:26 PM Central Standard Time, 
TheWho-Digest-Owner@igtc.com writes:


> From: AnEnglishBoy <campbell@fix.net>
> 
> "Who-> cares how Roger looks?
> He no longer interprets Pete's music properly, and IMO,
> Pete has sung better than Roger for 25 years."
> 
> 

Man, you are consistent if nothing else.  Does every post you make have to be 
negative and antagonistic?  You are such a reactionary, simply posting only 
when you read something you disagree with.  I didn't CARE how roger looked, 
just made an observation about what others said.  Depends on what you 
consider "better."  Pete's voice is nearly perfect yet he can go rough with 
the best of them (e.g.- acid queen live and christmas-IOW version).  There is 
an intensity, however, to Roger's voice, that takes most Who tunes to another 
level.  He is also incredibly versatile, going from Pure and Easy or Behind 
Blue Eyes to Who Are You or WGFA.  Haven't heard enough post 70s Roger and 
Pete to compare, however.