RE: Scott's little helper? ; Is it in my head, here from the sta rt

["Jeremy Craine" <jcraine@hotmail.com>]

True Kathy -
It's a bit like people wearing fur coats and saying "well I didnt kill the 
animal..."
and also-my last word on the subject too!!
JC


>From: Kathy <kathy@rogerdaltrey.net>
>To: TheWho@igtc.com
>Subject: RE: Scott's little helper? ; Is it in my head, here from the  sta 
>rt
>Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 23:32:25 -0500
>
>At 09:57 AM 10/19/2000, L. Bird wrote:
>
>>There is a BIG difference in what different cultures consider to be a
>>child, though, and at what age they're ready for sex, which makes a
>>certain amount of this relative.  The important thing (for GG, anyhow) is
>>that  he got caught doing something that's against the law.  Did anybody
>>hear if he actually molested children?  Or was
>>the porn all of it?
>
>Having stayed out of all of these off topic discussions(political and
>otherwise), I for some odd reason feel compelled to comment on this one
>post (and I promise to not comment further on the list).
>
>While GG may never in his entire life touched a child in an inappropriate
>manor I feel that he did molest children.  BECAUSE he wanted to look at
>photos/film of kids, those children were subjected (in one way or another)
>to some form of abuse.  The feeling that "he didn't abuse children" is
>totally wrong IMO and from a society standpoint is an attitude that
>desperately needs changing.
>
>
>Kathy
>
>If you like Roger Daltrey visit my web site:
>http://woof.simplenet.com/Roger/index.html
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.