[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Scott's little helper? ; Is it in my head, here from the sta rt
At 09:57 AM 10/19/2000, L. Bird wrote:
>There is a BIG difference in what different cultures consider to be a
>child, though, and at what age they're ready for sex, which makes a
>certain amount of this relative. The important thing (for GG, anyhow) is
>that he got caught doing something that's against the law. Did anybody
>hear if he actually molested children? Or was
>the porn all of it?
Having stayed out of all of these off topic discussions(political and
otherwise), I for some odd reason feel compelled to comment on this one
post (and I promise to not comment further on the list).
While GG may never in his entire life touched a child in an inappropriate
manor I feel that he did molest children. BECAUSE he wanted to look at
photos/film of kids, those children were subjected (in one way or another)
to some form of abuse. The feeling that "he didn't abuse children" is
totally wrong IMO and from a society standpoint is an attitude that
desperately needs changing.
Kathy
If you like Roger Daltrey visit my web site:
http://woof.simplenet.com/Roger/index.html