[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Viper vs. 993

To: jettaglx@igtc.com
Subject: Re: Viper vs. 993
From: Bill Hussey <vfrboy@home.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 21:54:30 -0400
References: <003001bec9a3$fb4c81e0$6c20aace@default> <37856F7D.2440828A@home.net> <002801beca44$f129fc00$0d806fc6@Roossinck.cmich.edu> <37866584.49C852A1@onramp.net> <004b01beca9d$258015e0$0f60c126@geckox> <37928084.29E0DEDC@home.net> <37947C41.D38A56D8@onramp.net>
Reply-To: jettaglx@igtc.com
Sender: owner-jettaglx@igtc.com

Ohh now ... come on Billy ... you should know it's taboo to do a HP-Per-Litre
comparison between a normally aspirated engine and a forced induction engine :-)

Bill
'98 GLX

"Billy T." wrote:

> It doesn't take a genius to extract 450 hp from ten cylinders, and 8 liters of
> displacement.  The porsch makes 111 hp per liter, where as the Viper is making
> only 56!  A bonestock VR6 is makeing 61 per liter.
>
> I still vote for the Porsche.
>
> b-

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Viper vs. 993
  - From: "Billy T." <btylaska@onramp.net>

References:
- Re: Slightly Off Topic (BMW question)
  - From: "Voltaire Almendrala" <valmen@pacbell.net>
- Re: Slightly Off Topic (BMW question)
  - From: Bill Hussey <vfrboy@home.net>
- Re: Slightly Off Topic (BMW question)
  - From: "Ryan Roossinck" <rooss1rs@cmich.edu>
- Re: Slightly Off Topic (BMW question)
  - From: "Billy T." <btylaska@onramp.net>
- Re: Slightly Off Topic (BMW question)
  - From: "Taylor Oliver" <taylor@ionet.net>
- Re: Slightly Off Topic (BMW question)
  - From: Bill Hussey <vfrboy@home.net>
- Viper vs. 993
  - From: "Billy T." <btylaska@onramp.net>

Prev by Date: Power windows and sunroof problems (solution)
Next by Date: Re: Power windows and sunroof problems (solution)
Prev by thread: Viper vs. 993
Next by thread: Re: Viper vs. 993
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread