[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Higher than 92 Octane (Northwest Post) -Reply
- Subject: RE: Higher than 92 Octane (Northwest Post) -Reply
- From: "Squier, Craig L. " <Craig.Squier@alcoa.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 1997 14:23:31 -0500
The W12 is coming out in 1-2 years. 12 cylinder 2 seater supercar.
Probably the most expemsive VW ever ~$40K (not too bad for a 12
cylinder). Save your bottle deposits (and hope the Miata trade-ins go
up)... ;)
Cab
>----------
>From: Jim Seibert[SMTP:jseibert@netwalk.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 1997 12:50 PM
>To: jettaglx@igtc.com
>Subject: Re: Higher than 92 Octane (Northwest Post) -Reply
>
>the octane thing is interesting...my miata runs like hell if i put more than
>87
>in it...weird little japanese car......veedub needs a 2 seat sportscar so i
>can
>get rid of the thing....
>
>Vojin Janjic wrote:
>
>> >>> Jim Seibert <jseibert@netwalk.com> 11/26/97 06:52am >>>
>> >this car prefer higher octane or is 87 fine....one of my other cars
>>(miata)
>> >hates anything higher than 87....comments??
>>
>> You may notice some, but not too much difference in performance of
>> VR6 engine... A label on the insisde of my gas cap door states someting
>> like:
>> "unleaded gas 87 oct or higher 92 oct rec"
>>
>> Some people claim that 92 octane gas is cleaner, so although is costs
>> more, you may save $$ on the long run (less engine deposits, less
>> maintenance). Others say that since different octane ratings are
>> formulated from the same distillate fractions, there should be no
>> difference in clenliness, just performance.
>>
>> I use 92 octane almost all of the time.
>>
>> Happy TG.
>> Vojin
>
>
>
>