Re: Banks Best

[Cecil <cecil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I dare say if Hunter played 37 minutes, he would have had 10 points off of
offensive boards alone, especially with Dampier out of the lineup.  I don't
know what the genesis of the love affair you have with Walter all of a
sudden, but you be quick to berate him when he clangs 1-8 from the field one
night in a close loss.

A good rebounder doesn't have to score much to help the team.  Silas and
Rodman wear multiple rings because of that ability.  Fortson has a decent
contract for the same reason.  I think Hunter's contributions are being
overlooked in the name of offense, when what he does is help the offense
tremendously with hard work and positioning.  He would never have been able
to contributed for that short stretch as he did if he wasn't NBA material.
A coach with a long term vision would be utilizing his strengths instead of
relegating him to the bench with a weak explanation.

How many double doubles has Walter had in comparison to Hunter this year?

Cecil (get the kid off the pine)

----- Original Message -----
From: Dan Forant <dforant1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <Celtics@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2004 7:38 AM
Subject: Re: Banks Best


> Carroll obviously has no confidence in Hunter for obvious reasons.  He
needs
> points. McCarty played fairly smart offensively and added 10 to the total.
> Hunter's done for this season. If you like him start a fan club for him.
>
> DanF
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Shawn Niles"
>
> > Brandon played all of 2 minutes tonight. Do you think maybe that is why
he
> > didn't break a sweat? How convenient of you to forget to mention that.
But
> I
> > guess it doesn't fit with your agenda...