[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why not Hunter?

To: "Celtics" <celtics@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Why not Hunter?
From: "Jim Hill" <jahill199@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 22:43:55 -0500
Reply-to: <jahill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-celtics@xxxxxxxx

If there was ever a match up waiting to be made, it was Hunter defending
Rogers.  I knew I wasn't the only one wondering what the heck Hunter has
done to upset Carroll for him to ignore this match up.  Come on Walter
against Rogers?  Geesh.

>Why not put Hunter on Rodney Rogers? NJ doesn't have a shotblocker without
>Kenyon. This is the perfect game to play Hunter. Wake up, Carroll!....

>DJessen33
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.637 / Virus Database: 408 - Release Date: 3/20/2004

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why not Hunter?
  - From: Kim Malo

Prev by Date: Re: This Can't Be True... And What Can The Celtics Do About It
Next by Date: Re: Why not Hunter?
Previous by thread: Why not Hunter?
Next by thread: Re: Why not Hunter?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread