From: Snoopy the Celtics Beagle <snoopy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Celtics@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Vescey's knowledge and Indiana
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 21:43:56 -0400
At 01:10 PM 9/10/03 -0400, Berry, Mark S wrote:
Shawn asked:
Does anyone else on list have an opinion of Jermaine? What's the
concensus?
--- --- ---
I don't understand Snoopy's problem with O'Neal either. He's a stud. He
scores, rebounds, blocks shots, runs the floor and gets better every year.
As for the crunch-time criticism, I think it's somewhat valid although
easily understandable....
So, did Jermaine struggle at times (not all the time) down the stretch of
games? Sure. But he was saddled with a coach without a clue and perimeter
players not really capable of either creating or making an open shot.
Basically, that's my problem. I've never said O'Neal wasn't a good player.
He is. But I think he's prone to problems at crunch time. Several
times, I have seen him blow a play, or commit a dumb foul--but ONLY in high
pressure situations. The closest--though faint--analogy is Shaq. He's a
tremendously talented player, but in a close game that's going to be
decided by free throws, I wouldn't want to ride the game on his FT
percentage.
I'm willing to concede the possibility--though I think it unlikely--that
Jermaine's problem stems from Thomas as a coach. How badly can you really
be shaken by the coach if you've got Reggie Miller to back you up?
Granted, Reggie's on the tail end of his career, but he's not chopped liver
either. Given a choice between O'Neal and Artest, I'll take O'Neal because
I think Artest is too big a pain in the patootie to be worth babysitting
until he starts acting his age and not his shoe size.
But right now, the Celtics have FAR too many close games to have anyone on
the court who isn't rock solid at crunch time. Jermaine would have to show
me grace under pressure to convince me he's worth the risk in the win/loss
column.