[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The Boston Celtics Mailing List Digest V10 #321



Oh how the facts hurt. I would like to like AW, let's see how he does in
camp with his supposedly new body.

DanF

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <GuyClinch@xxxxxxx>
To: <Celtics@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: The Boston Celtics Mailing List Digest V10 #321


> > Since Twan seems to be continously degraded on these boards, I challenge
> > anyone to name me 25 present players who they think today are better
players
> > than
> > Twan....
> >
> > DJessen33
>
> Looks like some people met your "challenge"..
> Come on guy.. Walker shot .38 from the field and .61 from the line. He was
> among the league leaders in turnovers and if that wasn't enough he was a
fairly
> poor rebounder for his position.
>
> 25 players are too easy...
> One can just look up the efficency numbers and see that Walker is a top
fifty
> player.
>
>
http://www.nba.com/statistics/default_regular_season_leaders/LeagueLeadersEFFQ
> uery.html
>
> 46. <A
HREF="http://www.nba.com/playerfile/antoine_walker/index.html?nav=page";>Anto
ine Walker</A> ( <A
HREF="http://www.nba.com/celtics/index.html?nav=page";>Boston Celtics</A>)
78  17.08
>
> Now the efficency stat isn't perfect..but it does indicate that many many
> players are more productive then Walker.
>
> Pete
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Pete