Re: quick thoughts on the nets game

["Dan Forant" <dforant1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree the Net's came to play and found some stiff resistance. Overall the
Celts played well. Let's not give up on Banks, remember Billups??

DanF

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Josh Ozersky" <jozersky1@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <Eggcentric@xxxxxxx>; <Celtics@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: quick thoughts on the nets game


> Make no mistake, Eggy.  The Nets came to
> play.  They ceded the game in the 4th with
> the Celtics leading.  I don't know if you saw
> the game, but the Nets announcers even said
> several times that neither team was playing like
> this was the preseason.  It was more like a playoff
> game...nobody was "fooling around."
>
> Josh
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <Eggcentric@xxxxxxx>
> To: <jozersky1@xxxxxxxxxx>; <Celtics@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 8:43 AM
> Subject: Re: quick thoughts on the nets game
>
>
> > < The Nets brought their A game > - Josh
> >
> > Holy cow. Seemed to me the Nets (especially concerning Kidd and
Mourning)
> > were merely fooling around while we were the ones taking the game so
> > seriously... i.e. Pierce with 30 points and our starters with big
minutes.
> >
> > Prior to the last few minutes of the game (when Obie inserted
> > Perkins and Hunter), we had our A team in against their scrubs during
> > most of the 4th quarter.
> >
> > These pre-season games are almost as misleading as the Summer Games.
> > Still, we have not looked very good.
> >
> > Egg