--- Kim Malo <kimmalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Nope, don't agree with this either. Banks could be > beating him one on one > but James gets the start because he gives us the > best chance to win and > issues with his own development don't interfer as > much with the other > development issues on the court. That last is one > that gets ignored too > many times in discussion over who is and isn't > getting PT and why.
Good point, but is O'Brien smart enough to think about this factor? I doubt it.
> > he is already providing the "learning by > >failure" model you propose below. > > Not the intensive training one on a particular > skillset I had originally > proposed. While he's also young and athletic enough > that that could be seen > by the student as a significant factor in his > getting beaten vs the > difference in pure PG skills, blurring the intended > lesson about how > important they are.
So, who are we talking about? Mark Jackson?
So basically you're advocating that we bring in a bunch of women to play against Marcus and when they beat him with their superior minds he'll suddenly see the light and become a savvy point himself. Good plan (and I'm only half kidding)