Do The Celtics Have The Worst Point Guards In The NBA?

[wayray@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Let's go to the scorecard to find out:

Well the Lakers are much better with Payton and Fisher,
and so are the Sonics with Barry, Murray, and Superstar Luke Ridnour.

Then there's Milwaukee with the fine TJ Ford, and Phoenix with
Marbury annd Barbosa. Who can forget the Nets with Kidd and Planinic, 
and the Sixers with Iverson, Snow, and Salmons. 

Minnesota comes in ahead with
Cassells and Hudson, as does the Hawks with Terry and Diaw.  

The Pacers do too with Anderson and Tinsley, while the Rockets have 
Francis, and the Bulls outshine the Celtics with Crawford and Hinrich,
well, whenever Hinrich recovers.

Charlotte has Davis, Wesley, and Armstrong; Land of the Cleve has
James; the Pistons with Billups and Hunter.

A slight edge to Miami with Wade and Coles; a bigger edge to Washington with
Arenas. 
  
The Kings are much better with Bibby and Jackson, as are the Warriors with Van Exel
and Claxton. 

TheTrailblazers point guard situation isn't great, but still it's better.

Denver comes out ahead with Miller, as do the Spurs with Parker, the Grizzlies
with Williams, and the Mavericks with Nash.

Carlos Arroyo with the Jazz is a gamer, but nothing special, as are the
Celtics point guards.

Orlando appears worse with Lue and Gaines, the Knicks are equally
inept until Vujanic joins them, and the Clippers are struggling too.

So, while the Celtics don't have the worse point guards in the NBA, 
they are clearly in the bottom four or five and in need of an upgrade.
Ray