Re: Perhaps The New Owners Could Ascribe The Celtics To Be....

[Cecil <cecil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

02-03  Dal  33  18.7   4.3  43.7  0.6  94.7  0.4  25.0  1.4  3.6  1.5  1.3  0.1  0.7  2.3   4.4

Griffin plays less than 20 minutes per game.  I don't think he is up for the All-Star team, is he?  Let's face it, though a few people appreciate you searching the newswires for any negative Celtic print you can find, even mentioning Griffin as a starter is misleading as hell.  Yeah he starts sometimes....but does he finish?  What's his role on that team?  Points?  Nope.  Rebounds?  Nope.  Assists?  Nope.  Minutes?  Nope.  He plays good D and tries not to commit any turnovers.

Your continued searches are sometimes worthwhile.  But your opinions are....... well they're yours.

Cecil


Way Of The Ray <wayray@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message 3E20073C.815B0845@ix.netcom.com">news:3E20073C.815B0845@ix.netcom.com...
> Competitive with Dallas.
> 
> Year after year, they're destroyed by this team. Nowitzki and Finley
> demolish Walker and Pierce, and Steve Nash runs rings around
> whatever slop is at the point for the Celtics. And hard to believe that
> AG
> can start for Dallas, but was deemed by Wallace and O'Brien as not good
> enough to even be a bench player for the Celtics.
> 
> Plus the Jim O'Brien method of coaching doesn't work against Dallas.
> You know the O' Brien method where they try to outshoot the opponent
> from the
> three-point line and hope that one of opposing team's best players is
> injured.
> Sure that may have worked against the Hornets, but the Mavs are too
> talented,
> too deep, and too better long distance shooters than the Celtics.
> Ray