Re: [Celtics' Stuff : Et tu; Callahan?-Herald

[Celtic4Hire@xxxxxxx]

Lance, welcome back to reality even it may only be a for a short time. This 
was an excellent perception and post. I wish more others could see it...

DJessen33

<Another crock.  I've got news for you, Callahan:  Vin's not supposed to be 
adding 
> much to this team.  He was SUPPOSED to be a third option, but Option #1 
> doesn't give up the ball, and there's no idea how to use a low-post player.
>  
> Vin has NEVER gotten serious minutes; I think he's had 20 just once.  I 
> wonder how you can't see that this year's squad isn't hurt by Baker; it's 
> hurt that Bruno Sundov can't play center at all and that Wookie is MIA even 
> when on the bench in a uniform.
>  
> It's hurt because there's no Anderson, and the team said right away that it 
> didn't need a point guard.  It's not hurt because Vin isn't giving you 
> 15/10.
>  
> It's a cheapshot, Gerry, for which you're famous for, blowing hot air on 
> the radio and in print.  Yes, it's a real problem for Wallace, when the 
> team's cap relief that was due is no longer there.  But that's next year.  
>  
> Right now, the C's DECIDED the Sundov could help, DECIDED that the didn't 
> need a PG and DECIDED that Wookie and Shammond deserved jerseys.  The one 
> thing we DID know is that adding a low post option was a new arena for the 
> Celts, it wasn't their style of play.  Who knew if it could succeed?
>  
> Right now, our PGs are way down the list in terms of assists, and our 
> forwards don't rebound.  The team is made of odd parts instead of proven 
> roles.  Vin Baker has NOTHING to do with this, and we were winning when 
> Vitaly was playing minimally, so if Vin's taken Vitaly's slot, why are we 
> so terrible?
>  
> Because of many other decisions that affect the team this year.
>  
> Write about Vin next year.  When that decision really matters.  You coward.>