Re: [Celtics' Stuff Re: The Kedick school comment and Walker

["Dan Forant" <dforant1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The Celts did look better without Toine the games he was out. We were
passing and driving. The team had some flow to it's offense. This is not a
statement saying we're better without Toine but when he was on the sidelines
he learned *nothing* These NBA guys have big ego's. That's where coaches are
supposed to come in.

DanF

> Overall criticism of PP isn't the point. The point I was trying to make
there
> was that PP was the only one hustling in the second half, getting the
> offensive rebounds. It is only up to speculation as to what is thoughts
were
> prior to the second tech. You and I speculate different things, only PP
knows
> for sure. I just think PP deserves less criticism that any of the others
> because he was actually trying and hustling. I would hope a player would
be
> disgusted a that level of play. It is the one's that aren't disgusted that
> you have to worry about....
>
> As for "what we had going" was the offense resolved around PP. He would
> initiate, draw the defense and then pass out or shoot. Now we are back to
the
> separate Walker isolation and the PP isolation. I didn't necessarly have a
> problem of going back to that with a lack of other options in Obie's
gimmick
> offense. But we needed to gradually phase away from a single prong attack
to
> a dual, especially with Walker playing with one leg tied behind his back.
And
> I don't fault Walker for trying. He was just more bad judgement by the
> coach....
>
> To me, the game capsule was of lack of perimeter defense (due to the
sagging
> defense strategy) and lack of offense (due to Walker and the Delk
forcefeed
> with a spoonfull of Shammond tossed in)....
>
> DJessen33