Re: Cs stay with gameplan but Nuggets don't read scouting report

[Tammo29@xxxxxxx]

Second attempt.

>>>Don't be hatin' on me, Tammo. You have collared the wrong guy. I think 
everyone can agree that PP shouldn't be trying to penetrate a set defense 
from 30 
feet from the basket. Everything else he was doing was good.  I was talking 
fourth quarter (I said second half) and you agree that he controlled the 
ball. But 
if you think Paul continously penetrating 1 on 5 is good basketball, you are 
entitled to your opinion....<<<<

No one is "hatin" on you.  I'm simply pointing out that you made a statement 
that is true in neither fact nor reasoning.


>>>>The Cs pull it out and the 
general game plan of working inside out was followed pretty much throughout 
the 
game with a few PP exceptions. <<<<
  
>>>>I'll have to say I didn't like some of PP's attempts at point 
guard in the second half. If he would have stayed with the gameplan, we would 
have won by 15.<<<<<

Here you state that the gameplan was to work inside out, then you say that 
Paul didn't stick with the game plan and if he had we would have won by 15.
Fact is he did stick with the gameplan.  He did get the ball to our only 
inside option in the fourth quarter consistently, Eric, and Eric didn't deliver in 
the fourth.
Four missed shots, 2 of 4 missed free throws, one turnover, one jump ball. 
Add the missed shot on the Battie cut to the basket and that's nine possessions 
in a twelve minute period that netted us two points.  Yet you state that 
because Paul mixed it up and got assists by going to Mike James and Jiri Welsch ( a 
combined 4 for 5 and 11 points) on the perimeter he somehow kept the team 
from winning big.
I'm simply pointing out that common sense says otherwise.



TAM