Re: [Celtics' Stuff ] Re: Bucks game #2

["Dan Forant" <dforant1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well it was Pierce that missed 2/3 that could have tied the game.....so in
fact he had a part in losing it as well as keeping us in it..

DanF

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "lapdoggy" Subject: Re: [Celtics' Stuff ] Re: Bucks game #2


> > It is apparent there are many Walker bashing " yahoo's "  who could
> > dish it
> > out when it came to being critical but take umbrage now that the shoe
> > is on the
> > other size 15 foot.
> >
> > And in the case of Saturday night's game . . .  no bashing. Just facts.
> >
> > "What's good for the goose . . ."
> >
> > CeltsSteve
>
>
> HA! I don't remember any board ever predicated on the bashing of a sole
> Celtic player, and I've been through many. Now there is.
> Pierce didn't lose Saturday's game. He was one of the reasons we were
> still in the game, like many other games where the C's have been
> narrowly beaten. Those are the facts. But then again I chose to look a
> the glass half full(which it is now that Walker is gone) rather than
> obsess on the fact that Twan was booted and Pierce wasn't.