Re: [Celtics' Stuff ] Re: Bucks game #2

[CeltsSteve@xxxxxxx]

In a message dated 11/30/03 9:19:07 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
lapdoggy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

> It's nice to see that the Pierce bashing yahoo's occasionally spill over to 
> this board. There is no point in arguing the merits of Pierce's skills with 
> any of those guys. It was obviously upsetting to see Paul miss the FT's at 
> the end of the game, but God forbid anyone that "spins on Paul's behalf".
> Of course this coming from someone, who part of a small pack, dissects 
> Pierce's every move. Talk about spinning, good gosh.
> I still contend that if Pierce was traded instead of Walker this would be a 
> 20-25 win team at most. Walker has 3 all stars along side of him now, his 
> glaring weakness's aren't going to show up quite as brightly as they did in 
> Boston. Though Dallas fans are already getting tired of his out of control 
> selfish shenannigans.
> Given the circumstances Pierce is doing a great job of carrying this team 
> along early on. The C's haven't lost any games by 52 points this year, and 
> though they've had some tough losses, they've been in every game.
> In this case, sour grapes would be more suitable for a nice honey, mint 
> and lemon marinated fruit salad.






It is apparent there are many Walker bashing " yahoo's "  who could dish it 
out when it came to being critical but take umbrage now that the shoe is on the 
other size 15 foot. 

And in the case of Saturday night's game . . .  no bashing. Just facts. 

"What's good for the goose . . ."               
    
CeltsSteve