Re: Terrific Balanced Scoring

["Dan Forant" <dforant1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Now why would PP take a lot of bad shots?? HEADLINE: because the rest of the
team sucks on average and we wouldn't be where we are now. He knows he
carries the team on his shoulders. As mentioned in an earlier post he is
wasting away in a rudderless system of mayhem. An addition of a couple
players and *basic coach*, *no headliner* and I think we move up out of the
abyss. We would go through Indy with KA and Rodney like crap through a
gaggle of geese.

I prayed to move KA. My bad. Making parallel moves is bad enough, but
backwards......

DanF

----- Original Message -----
From: <CeltsSteve@AOL.com>
To: <Celtics@igtc.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 7:05 AM
Subject: Re: Terrific Balanced Scoring


> In a message dated 4/21/03 8:19:46 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> dforant1@nycap.rr.com writes:
>
> > Terrific balanced scoring but 36% won't cut it. The boys did get their
> > exercise though, hoisting 26 3's and 26% accuracy. Indy knows the secret
> > now, keep Pierce from scoring 40. They didn't think of it the first
game,
> > but then again it's Indiana.
>
>
>
> This was a very winnable game. All it would have taken would have been
Pierce
> to get his average, not 40 as you suggest. Chipping paint off the rims at
a
> 31% clip over the first two games from the team's best scorer won't cut
it,
> though.
>
> Toine has stepped up and is shooting close to 50% from the field despite
> going primarily against O'Neil who is three inches taller and can elevate.
> Walter has stepped up. It's time for Pierce to do likewise. He better
improve
> his shot selection pronto. Game 1 was a performance for the ages but
that's
> old news now.
>
> As Janet Jackson would say "What have you done for me lately?"
>
>
>
>
> CeltsSteve