[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Maxwell's number
Actually, when I look back, you have to realize that the C's actually
twisted the knife a bit for Max. The last time a number was retired was in
1998, in the Garden. They waited until some 15 years later, for the Fleet
Center, a place Max never played in. Ainge, all things assuming, will be
the same, only later.
In my view, I think that it may well be Pierce's number that goes up before
Walker's does, unless they put together a few championship seasons. Then,
it's anyone's guess.
As to the criteria, the C's have always maintained that the retired numbers
don't always go to the "Great player" but to a great Celtics player. And
Max did, in fact, put the team on his back that grand night, and went
toe-to-toe with James Worthy, who is on his way to the NBA Hall of Fame
next fall. Does Max belong in the Hall of Fame? No. In the
rafters? Yeah, I think so.
At 06:10 PM 4/11/03 -0400, Ouellette Steve wrote:
>Am I the only one who think retiring Cedric Maxwell's number is ridiculous? I
>loved Max, and he earned that playoff MVP award, but come on.
>
> Then again, I suppose the rafters have long since gone from a pantheon
> of the
>great to a clothesline of the pretty-good-and-played-on-a-championship-team.
>Gerald Henderson here we come.
>
>If the Celtics don't set some kind of standards, soon, Antoine's jersey will
>be hanging up there in the future.
Snoopy the Celtics Beagle
Please visit the <http://www.celticsbeagle.net/>Celtics Beagle Website