Re: Jamal Crawford on the block

["Lance Jacobson" <lancejacob@xxxxxxxxx>]

Jim, I don't think we can afford Crawford with either of our picks, nor do
we have a player available that Krause would covet.  Doesn't mean JC
wouldn't be a good addition, and it's clear that his days in Chi-town are
numbered.


----- Original Message -----
From: "James A. Hill" <jahill@leasingservice.com>
To: "Celtics (E-mail)" <celtics@igtc.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:13 AM
Subject: Jamal Crawford on the block


> There is a story that makes sense about Chicago shopping Crawford.  There
> were a number of folks on the list who were interested in Crawford for a
> while.
>
> Crawford will apparently be the 2nd string PG and has been acting out
about
> it.  Chicago is looking for front court help though and I don't really see
a
> fit where we have anyone to trade both position wise and money wise.
>
> We do have a couple draft picks that Chicago may be interested in and the
> rights to our past second round pick.
>
> At this point would it be a distraction or a positive to add Crawford and
is
> he ready to be given the keys to the offense with the maturity issues he
> appears to be going through?  Could he be the PG of the future?  Most
> importantly can he shoot the 3?
>
> <Jim