Re: Mark's got points

["hironaka@xxxxxxxxx"<hironaka@xxxxxxxxx>]

Lance, basically I think you are nuts (when it comes to 
your Pierce obsession). Count me out of that. 

I said Pierce "helped" let Houston go for nearly 40. I 
made note of who was guarding him (for obvious reasons 
given that he was the only guy killing us). You should 
have too. I just don't understand.

Anytime you use a game like that as an occasion to bash 
Pierce, it'll comes across as a nutty obsession. 

Pierce got the assignment back in the fourth quarter, and 
he held Houston to 2 points. He made plays. He denied the 
ball. Shooting guards will score in this league, which 
doesn't hurt in fueling an obsession. How amazing is it 
to you that these guys tend to lead the team in scoring? 
We've had Jalen, Stack+MJ and then Houston. You can't let 
NBA 2-guards get hot (because its ridiculous how 
unstoppable their talent allows them to be), but Pierce 
wasn't the main guy getting burned.   

Sometimes, I don't know if all this is meant as self-
parody, tongue-in-cheek stuff. You go out of your way to 
be unconvincing.
 
I like reading your posts. But maybe work on your timing, 
unless the aim is to sound obsessive. I think you know 
more about basketball than I do. More importantly, its 
obvious that you are a Celtics fan in the end, which I 
appreciate.

But the whole Pierce thing...feel free to keep it up if 
you want. It certainly doesn't bother me. But count me 
out of the weird Kansas-bashing, Pierce-bashing, 
gratuitous list-member insulting stuff. Let that be your 
own shtick. 

Joe H.



 

 






-------------------
L'e-mail gratuit pas comme les autres.
NOMADE.FR, pourquoi chercher ailleurs ?